Okay, I tried, I really,
really tried, to have an open mind. I went to many, many meetings, and did the steps, but alas, it's not to be.
After giving it a lot of consideration, and a fair bit of research, I've come to the conclusion that it's time to move on. I do realize that people find hope in the program, and so what I'm voicing here is just my opinion from my own experience and observations.
First of all, the meetings in my area have very few people in recovery. Maybe one person per meeting at the very best. In fact, there were an astounding number of "fat serenity" members. These were members who were in the program for years, sometimes decades, and confidently claimed to be in recovery. Yet they were still obese, sometimes morbidly obese. I really found it shocking that this was possible, and that the program would give room for such self-defeating denial. It didn't seem to be a very healing thing at all. In fact, it was downright frightening.
Furthermore, it seems that there is some research that has challenged the supposed effectiveness of 12-step programs. There have been
studies tracking AA members who were referred by court orders into the program, for example. It seems that the alcoholics who attended AA fared far worse than those with no treatment at all, who just quit on their own. The vastest amount of recovery was seen in those who attended cognitive based therapy and groups.
I do realize that this is still open to debate, yet in my own experience I did attend a counseling group for survivors of child abuse in addition to the OA groups. I felt that the counseling group, with the trained facilitator, was far more encouraging. In OA, I often felt like it was the blind leading the blind.
In OA, there is the claim (which seems to be completely unfounded) that compulsive overeating is a disease, a physical, spiritual and emotional malady. I do see that overeating can have underlying emotional causes. But I'm starting to vehemently disagree with the notion that compulsive overeating is as a disease. In fact, I now see how this belief can actually lead many people to binge even more than ever. Personally, I gained weight the whole time I was in OA, and I think this notion of having a disease, of being powerless, really created mind-games that led to more eating.
On the other hand, in my survivors group, they suggested that eating disorders were simply coping mechanisms for many people who've suffered trauma as children. The comfort and escape of food helped the children survive situations in their lives that they had no control over, and then the eating problems continued into adulthood. Yet, as adults we can now replace these mostly self-destructive coping mechanisms with healthier ones. This seems to make a lot of sense to me, and I like how replacing the bad eating habits is very empowering, in contrast with saying I have a disease.
I also have a personal issue with the 12-step notion of embracing powerlessness, and seeking sanity from a higher power of our understanding. I felt that this went against my lifelong belief in empowerment for women. In particular, for survivors of abuse, empowerment is essential, and looking to an outside power for help seems debilitating. Janet, in the blog,
Two Fat Sisters Getting Skinny, gave a very interesting write up
here about her experiences with OA, and her criticism of the powerlessness idea. I can really see where she's coming from.
And, lastly, there is the question of how to define abstinence for compulsive overeaters. While for AA members it is very clear cut, in OA it is quite troublesome. Each overeater basically has to decide on a food plan, and what foods to cut out. The idea is that the disease is also an allergy of the body, where certain foods simply can not be eaten in moderation - they are trigger foods. What the trigger foods are can vary a great deal from person to person. Typically it might be buttery and sugary foods. I tried this with sugar, but found that every time I broke abstinence, I felt tremendous guilt and a sense of failure. These bad feelings about myself only led to despair and, well, yes, more eating. On the other hand, with programs like Weight Watchers, they encourage people to have a little bite of something and then say, okay that's enough, which seems more sensible. It seems far less extreme to just say I will limit certain foods because of the way they effect my blood sugar levels or what have you, rather than claiming I will forever abstain from them 100%.
Anyhow, I've decided to just do this on my own now, by thinking like a personal trainer. I once had great success (after my first pregnancy) with Weight Watchers, but can't bear to go back to the Points, and the dependance on that program. Up until my parenting years, I basically managed to keep my weight not skinny, but mostly a size 6 or 8, which is healthy. I didn't follow diets and just used common sense, in spite of my proclivity for emotional eating.